| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Levija Saplina
Supremacy Inc.
Not Found.
   |
Posted - 2011.08.19 08:23:00 -
[1]
I would be glad to act as third party to hold your collateral.
And I am interested in investing in this at the full amount of the bond. |
Levija Saplina
Supremacy Inc.
Not Found.
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 08:31:00 -
[2]
All right, if you can find your own third party with who you feel comfortable, maybe Tom and I can split this bond ?
Hey Tom ? COME ONNNNNNNNNNNNN !
|
Levija Saplina
Supremacy Inc.
Not Found.
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 09:25:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Magnu Stormhawk
If Chribba agrees to hold the collateral and handle liquidation in the event default, I will offer to take the whole amount at 7.5%
Now that's a low blow.
|
Levija Saplina
Supremacy Inc.
Not Found.
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 10:46:00 -
[4]
And this is how we reach ridiculous ROIs on col/uncol bonds.
I always thought that uncolaterized bonds should be at 20%+ and colaterized should be at 10% minimum.
|
Levija Saplina
Supremacy Inc.
Not Found.
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 11:33:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Jerry Pepridge
Originally by: Souris Blanche
Talked to Chribba earlier and sent him a mail with details. I am awaiting his response before I make any decisions about who will hold the collateral.
right here. it became clear that you are interested in bond roleplay & not real maths.
You do realize that if you give the collateral directly to tom/anyone here begging that you would be better off as you don't have to pay 3rd party fees.
its collateralized so i can;t really troll it (Step 6). just think about it, more isk for you if you let the person giving you the isk hold the stuff.
I can only agree with that.
If someone offers to cover the full bond money and hold onto the collateral, I don't see why anyone would go and look for another third party.
It's more like rep grinding than anything else really.
|
Levija Saplina
Supremacy Inc.
Not Found.
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 16:31:00 -
[6]
Dropping from 5% to 10% is a bit too much. So I guess Tom can take the whole bond.
|
Levija Saplina
Supremacy Inc.
Not Found.
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 18:18:00 -
[7]
You do understand that if you pay two investors 5% return on their investment, it doesn't make you pay out 10% return on the investment right ?
X * 1.05 + Y * 1.05 =/= (X+Y) * 1.10 ...
I mean, basic maths etc... |
Levija Saplina
Supremacy Inc.
Not Found.
|
Posted - 2011.08.19 18:22:00 -
[8]
Originally by: RAW23
Originally by: Levija Saplina
You do understand that if you pay two investors 5% return on their investment, it doesn't make you pay out 10% return on the investment right ?
X * 1.05 + Y * 1.05 =/= (X+Y) * 1.10 ...
I mean, basic maths etc...
He's paying the investors 5% on their investment and the collateral holder a 5% fee on the total, giving 10% total payout.
Oh I see, even worst than what I thought then. This is terrible. In so many ways. |
| |
|